# The onomastic case for the "Ostsiedlung" explanation of Hamelin, 26 June 1284: a critical review of Jürgen Udolph's evidence and its reception

> **Reading note.** Statements in this file about 26 June 1284, the 130 children, the east gate, the Calvary and the mothers' search describe the tradition as first attested c. 1430–50 (Lüneburg note) and later, not established facts of 1284. The report's verdict is a ranking of explanations, not a resolution: emigration ranks first at 42 in 100, the six alternatives together carry 58. See README.md and report.html.

All quotations are verbatim from the sources cited; page numbers for Udolph 1997 refer to the printed pagination of the Niedersächsisches Jahrbuch. Where I could not reach a primary publication I say so explicitly.

---

## 0. Sources actually consulted, and what could not be reached

**Read in full (primary):**
- Jürgen Udolph, "Zogen die Hamelner Aussiedler nach Mähren? Die Rattenfängersage aus namenkundlicher Sicht", *Niedersächsisches Jahrbuch für Landesgeschichte* 69 (1997), pp. 125–183. Full PDF on the Göttingen Academy site: https://adw-goe.de/fileadmin/forschungsprojekte/ortsnamen_rhein_elbe/dokumente/Publikationen_Udolph_PDF/1996-2000/196._Udolph_Zogen_die_Hamelner_Aussiedler_nach_Maehren_1997.pdf . According to the Academy's bibliography a reprint appeared in 2023 as no. 480 in *Namen – Zeugen der Geschichte* (ed. K. Casemir / U. Ohainski, Heidelberg: Winter 2023; https://www.winter-verlag.de/de/detail/978-3-8253-6771-8/Udolph_Namen_Zeugen_der_Geschichte/ ).
- Jürgen Udolph, "Schall und Rauch. Orts- und Familiennamen [Brandenburgs]", in *Das Brandenbuch. Ein Land in Stichworten*, Potsdam 2015, pp. 189–192 (PDF: https://adw-goe.de/fileadmin/forschungsprojekte/ortsnamen_rhein_elbe/dokumente/Publikationen_Udolph_PDF/2011-2015/448._Udolph_Orts-_und_Familiennamen._In._Brandenbuch.pdf ).
- Alfred Cammann, "700 Jahre 'Rattenfänger von Hameln' (1284–1984) und die These vom Ende in Masuren", *Preußenland* 22 (1984), pp. 1–3 (PDF: https://hiko-owp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Preussenland_Jahrgang-22_1984.pdf ).
- *Pommersches Urkundenbuch* II/2 (1278–1286), ed. R. Prümers, Stettin 1885, OCR text via archive.org (https://archive.org/details/kpbc.umk.pl.Pomorze_062_04_23540 ), and the person register in III/2 (https://archive.org/details/kpbc.umk.pl.Pomorze_062_06_23553 ).
- Udolph's own bibliography pages (adw-goe.de and prof-udolph.com), the Museum Hameln index of all yearbook articles 1962–2024 (https://museumhameln.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2024-08_Uebersicht-Museumsjahrbuch-Aufsaetze-ab-1962-2024.pdf ), the German and English Wikipedia wikitexts with their footnotes, the Wikipedia articles on Beveringen, Hammelspring, Hamelspringe, the Grafen von Spiegelberg and Kopań, and the sites of Templin, Pritzwalk, the Prignitz-Museum, the Landkreis Prignitz and Archaeofirm on settlement chronology.
- Press: *The Independent* 27 Jan 1998 (Imre Karacs, "Twist in the tale of Pied Piper's kidnapping"), *Tagesspiegel* 20 Feb 2006 ("Das Nachnamen-Rätsel"), BBC Travel 3 Sep 2020 (R. Kadushin), t-online 28 Jun 2023, Audible blog 16 Jan 2025, planet-wissen (2014/2024).

**Not reachable (stated where relevant):** the Dewezet articles ("Wo sind nur die Hamelner Kinder hin?", "Die drei wichtigsten Theorien", "Aktenzeichen Rattenfänger") — HTTP 403; the Digitales Familiennamenwörterbuch (namenforschung.net) entry "Hamel" — blocked by an anti-bot wall; Mieder's *The Pied Piper: A Handbook* (2007) — archive.org lending copy, OCR restricted; Uther's article in the *Enzyklopädie des Märchens* — paywalled; Hartmann 1941 on the Counts of Spiegelberg; Sophie Wauer's *Ortsnamenbuch der Uckermark* (2000); the TIME International piece of 27 April 1998 (Ursula Sautter, "Fairy Tale Ending") — known only through the passages quoted on English Wikipedia; Bichlmeier's 2024 review of Udolph's collected essays (*Die Sprache* 56/1, pp. 216–231) — paywalled.

---

## 1. What Udolph actually claimed, and where

### 1.1 The one scholarly publication

Udolph's Rattenfänger work rests on a single scholarly article, the 59-page 1997 essay. His bibliographies for 1996–2000, 2001–2005 and 2006–2010 on the Göttingen Academy site list no other Hamelin item; his own site lists only no. 196 (1997) and its 2023 reprint. The Brandenbuch piece (2015) is a four-page popular restatement. Everything else — the "surnames entered into a computer", "Polish telephone books", "Querhammel clusters north-east of Berlin" — comes from newspaper and broadcast coverage, not from a publication of his that I could find.

He frames the article narrowly. It is not an argument *for* the Ostsiedlung reading but an audit of the name evidence used by earlier proponents, "vorausgesetzt, die Ostkolonisationstheorie liegt der Erzählung wirklich zugrunde" (p. 125). He explicitly says: "Ich werde im folgenden daher keineswegs zum Sagenstoff selbst beitragen oder beitragen können, sondern nur zu einem Teilbereich … die schon lange diskutierte Frage, wohin die Aussiedler aus dem Hamelner Raum gezogen sein könnten" (p. 125). His motive is methodological: onomastics "verlangt eine strenge Methodik …, die von fast keinem der bisherigen Interpreten der Sage beherrscht wurde" (p. 125), and he promises to show "wie leichtfertig und oberflächlich man doch gelegentlich mit dem Namenmaterial umgegangen ist, zumeist wenn es darum ging, die Richtigkeit einer These zu beweisen" (p. 126).

### 1.2 Method

The article is a case-by-case philological test of every name equation proposed by Wolfgang Wann (Moravia, 1949/1984), Hans Dobbertin (Pomerania/Baltic, 1955–1990) and Lieselott Enders (Uckermark, 1987/1992), against the oldest attested forms. His tools are the *Brandenburgisches Namenbuch* (Sophie Wauer, *Die Ortsnamen der Prignitz*, 1989; *Die Ortsnamen der Uckermark*, 1996, and her then-unpublished study "Die Problematik der Namenübertragung am Beispiel der Uckermark"), Enders's *Historisches Ortslexikon* (Uckermark, 1986) and *Die Uckermark* (1992), Hosák–Šrámek for Moravia, Polish name dictionaries (Rospond, Rymut, Czopek-Kopciuch, Górnowicz), and charter collections (Westfälisches UB, Hamelner UB, Riedel's Codex diplomaticus Brandenburgensis, the Pommersches and Preußisches Urkundenbuch, Feyerabend's Riga/Reval surnames). A transfer is accepted only when the eastern form cannot be explained from local Slavic or German vocabulary or from a personal name, and preferably when the name type was no longer productive at the time of colonisation. The decisive example is Beveringen near Pritzwalk, first recorded 1368 *Beueringhe*: he adopts Wauer's point that no formation "PN. Bever + -ingen" is possible, "da zur Zeit der mittelalterlichen deutschen Ostsiedlung Namen mit dem Suffix -ingen nicht mehr gebildet wurden" (p. 151, quoting Wauer 1989, p. 61), so that "es sich bei den Namen in der Prignitz und in Pommern aufgrund des nicht mehr produktiven Suffixes nur um eine Namenübertragung handeln kann" (p. 152).

The bulk of the article is negative. He dismantles almost the whole Moravian dossier: the Hotzenplotz villages (Petersdorf, Johannesthal, Arnsdorf, Batzdorf, Pittarn, Liebenthal, Röwersdorf, Peischdorf) are Slavic or generically Low German, not Weser names; Braunsberg/Bruntál is not named for Bishop Bruno; and the "Hamlíkov = Hamlingen" equation on which Wann and Spanuth relied collapses — "Vergleicht man mit diesen überzeugenden und unzweifelhaften Herkunftsnamen [Quernhamel] die Versuche von W. Wann und W. Scherzer, mit aller Macht in dem Wüstungsnamen Hamlikov bei Brünn einen Zusammenhang mit Hameln zu entdecken, so wird die Diskrepanz zwischen Fakten und Wünschen besonders deutlich" (p. 174). He is equally severe with Dobbertin ("schlimme Fehler", p. 149): Alfeld/Altfelde, Basdorf, Fanger, Friedeberg, Fürstenau, Heyen, Hohenbocka, Hombok, Lichtenau, Mellen, Nickelsdorf, Piepenburg, Rothenfier, Spiegel near Kallies, Spiegelsdorf, Spiegelhagen, Vorwerk, Wohnsdorf and Wünsdorf are all struck out, and the whole "Koppen = Kopahn" identification is rejected: "Es ist unzulässig, aus der zufälligen Ähnlichkeit der Hamelner Koppen mit einem slavischen Ortsnamen bei Rügenwalde (Kopahn – Kopań) oder dem Namen der Schneekoppe Folgerungen zu ziehen" (p. 162).

### 1.3 The positive result: twelve "secure" transfers

What survives is his table A (p. 179), "Verbindungslinien zwischen Weser- und Leinegebiet und dem Osten":

| No. | Weser/Leine name | Eastern counterpart(s) | Oldest eastern attestation given by Udolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beverungen (Weser) | Beveringen near Pritzwalk (Prignitz); Beweringen/Bobrowniki near Stargard (Pomerania) | 1368 *Beueringhe* |
| 2 | Everstein (Holzminden) | Everstein/Wojcieszyn near Naugard | (Everstein counts in Pomerania from 1270s) |
| 3 | Schaumburg | Altschaumburg north of Küstrin | 1460 *Schawenborch* |
| 4 | Bischofshagen (Löhne) | Bischofshagen, deserted, near Greiffenberg (Uckermark) | 1375 *Byscoppeshaghen* |
| 5 | Biesterfelde (Pyrmont) | Boisterfelde near Prenzlau | 1375 *Bistervelt* |
| 6 | Dalhausen (Beverungen) | Dahlhausen near Pritzwalk | 1487 *Dalehusen* |
| 7 | Hamelspringe (Bad Münder) | Hammelspring near Templin | 1375 *Havelspryng*, 1438 *Hamelspringe* |
| 8 | Hindenburg/Hinnenburg (Brakel, near Höxter) | Hindenburg (Altmark), Hindenburg/Lindenhagen near Prenzlau, Hindenburg near Templin, Hindenburg near Naugard | 1283; 1269 *Fredericus de Hyndenborg*; 1369; 1317 |
| 9 | Rautenberg (Hildesheim) | Rutenberg (Uckermark), Rautenberg (Ermland) | 1300; 1347 |
| 10 | Spiegelberg (Coppenbrügge) | Spiegelberg near Pasewalk; Spiegelberg near Allenstein | (no early form given); 1360 |
| 11 | Depenau (Burgdorf) | Tiefenau near Marienburg | 1250 *a castro Dypenowe* |
| 12 | "Westfalen" | Wüstung Westfalen near Kyritz | 1315 *in campo westualia* |

Against this, only two Moravian equations remain (Fülme–Fulštejn, Schaumburg–Šaumburk). His summary: "ohne Frage bestehen viel sicherere Namengleichungen zwischen dem Wesergebiet und den Kolonisationsgebieten nördlich von Berlin, vor allem der Prignitz, der Uckermark und mit Pommern. Die Gleichung Hamelspringe – Hammelspring spricht für sich" (p. 176). And, on the map: "Deutlich erkennbar sind die engen Verbindungen mit dem Nordosten, wobei zu betonen ist, daß nicht Pommern das eigentliche Ziel war, sondern die Prignitz und die Uckermark. Hier finden sich fast alle Namen des Weser- und Leinegebietes wieder. Erst in einem weiteren Vordringen wird offenbar die Oder überschritten … Benachbarte Orte wie Hindenburg und Hammelspring sowie Beveringen und Dahlhausen deuten auf gewisse Konzentrationen der Siedler aus dem Wesergebiet hin" (p. 179).

On Hammelspring specifically: "Die Übertragung des ON. darf als gesichert bezeichnet werden. Es besteht Grund zu der Vermutung, daß Conrad II. von Hamelspringe entscheidend bei der Kolonisation in die Gebiete nördlich von Berlin mitgewirkt hat" (p. 157) — the latter on the authority of H. Schiffling's local *Chronik Hamelspringe* (1980). It is worth noting that the town of Templin now presents this conjecture as fact ("Um 1241 … Conradus II. de Hamelspring und … Amelungus de Lippia" as locators; https://www.templin.de/templin/ortsteile/hammelspring/ ), and the village celebrated its "750th anniversary" in 1993, although Udolph himself gives 1375 as the oldest record and Wikipedia notes "Andere Angaben geben hingegen als erste urkundliche Erwähnung das Jahr 1375 an" (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammelspring ).

### 1.4 Family names in the 1997 article

The surname section ("Familiennamen von Weser und Leine im Osten", pp. 173–175) is short and entirely documentary. It lists Weser nobles on Livonian/Prussian journeys (Pyrmont 1207, Hallermund, Adensen 1209, Plesse 1211, Dassel 1220, Homburg 1221, Spiegel von Desenberg 1252–98), the Duding(h)e family (Duingen) in Mecklenburg c. 1230, the Gruelhut, Spole (1261 Mecklenburg, 1304 Brandenburg), Stange and Trampe families, and two groups of names that matter here:

- *Hamel*: "mehrfach erscheint ein Familienname Hamel in Pommern, z. B. 1317 Lodekinus de Hamel, 1318 Thilo de Hamel (in Berlin ansässig), worunter sich auch gelegentlich ein Abkömmling aus Hohenhameln bei Hildesheim befinden kann" (p. 174).
- *Quernhamel*: because Hameln was officially called Quernhameln in the 14th century (1323 *in Quernhamelen*, 1345 *Hamelen alias Quernhamelen*, etc.), "ist für Personen, die diesen Namen tragen, oder für ihre Eltern oder Großeltern Hameln als Herkunftsort mit Sicherheit anzunehmen. Zu nennen sind hier Wedego Quernhamel, 1357 Bürger von Danzig, 1377/78 Coneke von Querrehamel, Grundstücksbesitzer ebenda, aus Frankfurt/Oder: 1441 peter vnd hanse, gebrudern, gnannt die quernhamele, 1473 … Quernhammel, Herrn des Raths, 1486 Hans Qwerenhamer … Bis Riga weisen die Spuren: 1303 Hermannus, Thiedemannus Quernehamel" (p. 174).

That is all. There is no comparison of a Hameln burgher list with Prignitz/Uckermark surnames, no distribution map, no telephone data. On the Moravian side he actually argues the *opposite* of the press claim about Hamel-type names: for Wann's "Hamel (Hamal)", "Hamelinus" and "Haemler" he writes that Haemler "verrät Umlaut und damit Ableitung von dem altdeutschen Namen Hamilo, Hemilo, bei allen drei Namen kommt eher der Hammel als Übername in Betracht als der Ortsname Hameln" (p. 144).

### 1.5 Destination and date

Destination: "Wenn es einen Rattenfänger gegeben haben sollte (es handelt sich aber wohl um einen zweiten Erzählstrang, der erst spät ausgeprägt wurde), dann hätte er die Hamelner mit Sicherheit weder nach Siebenbürgen oder nach Mähren, sondern nur nach Brandenburg, in die Prignitz, die Uckermark oder nach Pommern geführt. Das jedenfalls besagen die Ortsnamen" (Schlußwort, point 5, p. 180). Date: he assigns none from the names and says so — "Zur genauen Datierung des Auszugs der Hamelner Jungleute vermögen die Ortsnamen natürlich nichts beizutragen. Aber immerhin läßt sich sagen, daß das anvisierte Jahr sich sehr gut in die Hochphase der deutschen Ostkolonisation einpaßt" (p. 176). His own list of first attestations of the "secure" transfers runs from 1248 to 1487 (p. 176). He also rejects Moravia on chronological grounds: Bishop Bruno died 1281 and "Nach dessen Tod 1281 erlosch die Zuwanderung aus dem Wesergebiet" (p. 180), citing G. Schnath's 1980 objection that the Olmütz diocese was settled "schon 1240/50".

### 1.6 Later restatements and the press versions

*Brandenbuch* 2015: "diese Ostsiedlung ist auch mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit der Kern der Rattenfängersage: junge Menschen verlassen ihre Heimat und werden nie wieder gesehen … Beveringen (bei Pritzwalk) – Beverungen an der Weser; Bischofshagen …; Boisterfelde …; Dahlhausen …; besonders bei Hammelspring (bei Templin) – Hamelspringe" (p. 190). Again only place names.

The surname story enters through the press in 1998. *The Independent* (27 Jan 1998) quotes him on "little Hamelns in the Prignitz and Uckermark, north of Berlin, and in the vicinity of Stargard" — i.e. place names — and, asked who the Piper was, "I have no idea" (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/twist-in-the-tale-of-pied-pipers-kidnapping-1141174.html ). TIME International (27 Apr 1998, Ursula Sautter) is the source of the sentences endlessly recycled in English: "Udolph entered all the known family names in the village at that time and then started searching for matches elsewhere. He found that the same surnames occur with amazing frequency in the regions of Prignitz and Uckermark … He also found the same surnames in the former Pomeranian region", plus "five villages called Hindenburg running in a straight line from Westphalia to Pomerania, as well as three eastern Spiegelbergs and a trail of etymology from Beverungen … to Beveringen … to Beweringen" (quoted on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pied_Piper_of_Hamelin ). The "Hindenburg" and "Beveringen" items are the 1997 place names; the "family names" sentence has no counterpart in print.

Udolph's own site describes the episode as a media construction: "Eine Agentur behauptete, dass Prof. Udolph anhand von Ortsnamen eine in der deutschen Kultur tief verwurzelte Sage aufgeklärt habe … Prof. Udolph konnte durch seine Forschung Parallelen zwischen Ortsnamen im Weserbergland und dem heutigen Brandenburg feststellen … Dieser Bericht weckte das Interesse der Medien und führte dazu, dass er bald zum beliebten Experten einer Radiosendung über Familiennamen avancierte" (https://www.prof-udolph.com/ueber-uns/ ). The *Tagesspiegel* (20 Feb 2006) likewise says the essay concerned "die erstaunliche Parallelität zwischen Ortsnamen im Raum Hameln und Brandenburg" and that an agency had "zugespitzt" (sharpened) it; the same article describes the telephone-CD method he uses for surnames in general (https://www.tagesspiegel.de/gesellschaft/medien/das-nachnamen-ratsel-1306102.html ). In other words, the surname-distribution work is what he did *after* and *because of* the Rattenfänger publicity, not the basis of it.

German popular outlets add a further claim I could not trace to any publication: that Hameln's alias Quernhameln survives "als Familienname Querhammel oder Varianten davon gehäuft nordöstlich von Berlin" (search summaries of the Dewezet pieces; the sentence is absent from the current German Wikipedia article, which in its Udolph paragraph mentions only Hammelspring and Groß Spiegelberg, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rattenf%C3%A4nger_von_Hameln ). A check of Das Telefonbuch today yields three "Querhammel" entries — all in Nuthe-Urstromtal and Dahme/Mark (Teltow-Fläming, *south* of Berlin) — and three "Querhammer" entries in Hamburg and Gettorf (https://www.dastelefonbuch.de/Suche/Querhammel ; https://www.dastelefonbuch.de/Suche/Querhammer ). Whatever the origin of the claim, it is not "gehäuft nordöstlich von Berlin" now.

---

## 2. What data did he use?

- **1997 article**: medieval documentary forms only (charter books, the Brandenburg Landbuch of 1375 via the Namenbuch volumes, Riedel's CDB, Pommersches UB, Preußisches UB, Feyerabend's Riga/Reval surname corpus, the Hamelner Urkundenbuch of 1887), interpreted through the Brandenburgisches Namenbuch and Polish/Czech name dictionaries. He never uses modern surname distributions in this article.
- **Later surname work**: a German telephone-directory CD and a custom Polish CD (Tagesspiegel 2006); Udolph 2006, "Familiennamen in ihrer Bedeutung für die Dialektologie, Wüstungsforschung und Siedlungsgeschichte: Anwendungsmöglichkeiten digitaler Familiennamenverzeichnisse", *Zunamen* 1 (2006), pp. 48–75 — a general methodological paper, not about Hameln.
- **The 1998 press**: "computer" matching of "all known family names in the village" (TIME). No such dataset is described anywhere in his writings. Given that the *Hamelner Urkundenbuch* (to 1407) records mostly patrician and clerical bynames, and that the comparison regions have no comparable 13th-century burgher lists (the Landbuch of 1375 lists lords, rents and services, not peasant surnames), the "match" could only have been made with modern data, which is precisely the kind of evidence he did not put in print.

This matters for the question posed: in 1284 hereditary surnames were only forming, and only among urban patricians. Udolph himself quotes Frenzel and Rumpf against Wann: "Diese Bevölkerungsschichten hatten im 13. Jahrhundert noch keine Familiennamen. Die bürgerlichen Familiennamen bildeten sich damals erst langsam beim Patriziat heraus" (p. 148). The same objection applies to any surname-matching argument for the Prignitz.

---

## 3. Strongest criticisms of the onomastic argument

### 3.1 Surnames cannot identify a 1284 cohort
See 2 above. Migrants of 1284 who were "Kinder" (young townspeople, servants, journeymen) would mostly have carried no fixed surname; a byname "de Hamelen"/"Quernhamel" is exactly what a migrant would *acquire* in the new place, so its presence proves Hameln origin but says nothing about when or in what numbers people left. Udolph's own Quernhamel attestations are in Riga (1303), Danzig (1357, 1377/78) and Frankfurt/Oder (1441–1486) — Hanseatic and Ascanian towns, not villages of the Prignitz or Uckermark — and a Hameln merchant family in Danzig or Riga in the 14th century is what one expects of any Hanseatic town.

### 3.2 "Hamel" is not diagnostic
The Digitales Familiennamenwörterbuch (namenforschung.net, entry "Hamel"; the page itself was blocked, the etymologies are as reported in search excerpts of it) gives at least four origins: Middle Low/High German *hamel* "castrated ram" as an indirect occupational name for shepherds/gelders; the same word as a nickname; a *Herkunftsname* to Hameln **or** Hohenhameln (Kr. Peine); and a topographic name for someone living at a steep or broken slope. Udolph himself allows Hohenhameln for the Pomeranian "de Hamel" (p. 174) and prefers *Hammel* as a nickname for the Moravian "Hamel/Hämler/Hamlinus" (p. 144). Hamel is also a common French and Dutch surname (forebears.io counts tens of thousands in Algeria, Canada, the USA and France). Only the compound *Quernhamel* is unambiguous — and it is rare and medieval.

### 3.3 Modern distributions are unusable for 1284
Seven centuries of movement intervene, above all the post-1945 expulsions and resettlements, which Udolph himself stresses for Brandenburg: the Slavic names there "stammen zum großen Teil aus der Zuwanderung durch Umsiedlung, Vertreibung und Flucht am Ende des 2. Weltkriegs" (Brandenbuch, p. 191). Low German surnames of the *Hamel/Hämel/Hameler/Hamelmann* type are spread thinly across the whole North German plain; a "cluster" in the Prignitz or Uckermark could only be assessed against a null model (e.g. the same names in the Altmark, Mecklenburg, Holstein, the Neumark), against the population share of these small districts, and with the many polygenetic origins of the names removed. No such test has been published.

### 3.4 The place-name transfers are real but undated — and several pre-date 1284
Udolph's own list of first attestations shows the problem. Of the "secure" transfers, four are attested *before* 1284 (Tiefenau 1250, Theodericus de Leine 1248, Woldenberg 1248, Fredericus de Hyndenborg 1269, Hindenburg in the Altmark 1283); most of the Uckermark names first surface in the Landbuch of 1375 (Hammelspring, Bischofshagen, Boisterfelde, Hindenburg near Templin); Beveringen is 1368, Dahlhausen 1487, Altschaumburg 1460; the Ermland Spiegelberg was founded in 1348/1360 (Cammann 1984, p. 2). The Uckermark *-hagen* villages that he adduces as proof of "westfälischer Siedlungseinfluß" were, in Enders's words which he quotes, founded "unter pommerscher Herrschaft bis 1250 im Uckerland" (p. 155). If Hammelspring was indeed a foundation of Conrad II of Hamelspringe (Schiffling's conjecture, adopted by Templin as "1241/1243"), then the most striking Hameln-area name in the east belongs to the 1240s, forty years before the Piper. What the corpus demonstrates is a migration corridor Weser/Leine → Altmark → Prignitz/Uckermark → Hinterpommern/Prussia used repeatedly between c. 1230 and c. 1360, largely by knightly families (Everstein, Hindenburg/Hinnenburg, Spiegelberg, Rutenberg, Depenau, Wohldenberg, Spole, Duding) who named castles, lordships and villages after their homes. That is exactly what Udolph states ("Es gibt gute Gründe, die Ortsnamen des Ostens mit dem Ziel der Hamelner Auswanderer in Verbindung zu bringen", Schlußwort 3), and it is also the limit of the argument: a corridor is not an event.

Moreover only one of the twelve equations (Hamelspringe–Hammelspring) is from Hameln's immediate neighbourhood; the others belong to Höxter/Brakel/Beverungen (Hindenburg, Beverungen, Dalhausen), Lippe/Pyrmont (Biesterfelde), Schaumburg, Holzminden (Everstein), Hildesheim (Rautenberg, Wohldenberg), Burgdorf (Depenau), Löhne (Bischofshagen) and Coppenbrügge (Spiegelberg). The evidence is regional (Weserbergland), not municipal (Hameln).

### 3.5 Was the Prignitz/Uckermark still being colonised in 1284?
The settlement chronology weakens the choice of destination. The Prignitz was colonised from the Wendish Crusade of 1147 onwards, "vor allem" in the 12th and 13th centuries; the Prignitz-Museum notes that "etwa die Hälfte der bis um 1300 gegründeten Orte" were later deserted, i.e. the founding phase was essentially over by 1300, and names the settlers as "vor allem Flamen, Holländer, Friesen und Rheinländer" (https://www.prignitz-museum.de/siedlungsgeschichte-der-region-an-havel-und-elbe/ ); the Landkreis's own history speaks of "sächsischen, fränkischen und niederländischen Siedlerfamilien" and gives 257 Slavic against 169 German medieval village names (https://www.landkreis-prignitz.de/de/zu-gast-im-landkreis/Portrait/geschichte_index.php ). The planned settlement of the *terra Pritzwalk*, where Beveringen and Dahlhausen lie, occurred "erst unter den Markgrafen von Brandenburg" (Archaeofirm, Ch. Kunze), i.e. in the 13th century, and Pritzwalk had town law by 1256. The Uckermark passed wholly to Brandenburg by the Treaty of Landin in 1250, its northern part having already been settled under Pomeranian rule "von Norden und Nordwesten her aus dem holsteinisch-mecklenburgischen und westfälisch-niedersächsischen Raum" (Enders, quoted by Udolph p. 156); Hammelspring lies in the Zehdenick area whose Cistercian nunnery was founded 1250. German Wikipedia's synthesis on the Ostsiedlung notes "ein Erlahmen der Siedlungsbewegung um 1300" (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hochmittelalterliche_Ostsiedlung ). A locator recruiting in Hameln in 1284 would therefore more plausibly have been working for Hinterpommern (Naugard/Hindenburg, settled "um 1263 bis 1274 vom Weserbergland aus" according to Dobbertin, quoted p. 165), the Neumark, Pomerelia or Prussia than for the Prignitz — which is Dobbertin's and Cammann's geography, not Udolph's. Udolph's map, in short, reflects where 13th-century Weser people had *already* settled, not where a recruiter would have taken them in 1284.

### 3.6 Historians' objections
- **Bernd Ulrich Hucker** (1985, "Der Auszug der hämelschen Kinder 1284 aus quellenkritischer Sicht", in N. Humburg ed., *Geschichten und Geschichte*, Hildesheim 1985, pp. 89–102), quoted by Udolph (p. 175 f.): given "wie dicht die personellen Beziehungen hin und her waren", "Von einem spurlosen Verschwinden der Hamelner hätte keine Rede sein können und eine erfolglose Suche der Mütter bliebe angesichts der Funktionstüchtigkeit des Schiffsverkehrs und des Informationsnetzes im Hanseraum ziemlich rätselhaft." Udolph's answer is Dobbertin's: "es gab gewiß unzählige Vermißtenschicksale" and "einige wenige Unglücksfälle reichen aus, um in der Heimat zu gewaltigen Katastrophen umgedeutet zu werden" (p. 176). This is the crux: the better the name evidence for dense, routine Weser–Brandenburg–Pomerania contact, the harder it is to explain why a large, organised, legal emigration should have been remembered as an inexplicable loss with a precise date.
- **Hans Eberhard Mayer** (review of Dobbertin, *Deutsches Archiv* 14, 1958, p. 584), quoted approvingly by Udolph (p. 177): Dobbertin succumbed to the temptation "die Klärung der Vergangenheit bis zur letzten Konsequenz und zum letzten Detail treiben zu wollen (so etwa, wenn er glaubt, das Schiff mit den Auswanderern sei 1284 Juli 22 vom Johanniterhof Cuppen bei Rügenwalde zum letztenmale gesehen worden)"; "Daß der Zug ins Kolonialland ging, sei als Möglichkeit gerne geglaubt. Zu weiteren Vermutungen reichen die Quellen nicht hin."
- **Norbert Humburg** (Museum Hameln) characterised Dobbertin's Pomeranian "Adelswanderung" as a theory its author had "seit Jahrzehnten immer wieder als die einzig mögliche Erklärung des Sagenkerns zu beweisen" tried (Jahrbuch Museumsverein Hameln 1982/84, pp. 59 f., quoted p. 175); W. Ueffing (same volume, pp. 70–84) even doubted the 1284 date. Humburg is thanked in Udolph's first footnote for corrections, so the museum was involved in, not opposed to, the 1997 article; I found no published statement by Humburg on Udolph's surname claims.
- **Museum Hameln today** (Wibke Reimer to the BBC, 3 Sep 2020): the locator scenario is presented as the leading hypothesis, but the theories "don't explain the very particular date cited for the loss of the children, and the local sense of trauma" (https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20200902-the-grim-truth-behind-the-pied-piper ). Museum director Claudia Höflich rejects Hüsam's Koppenberg-massacre variant because "es keine Anhaltspunkte gibt, dass die Jugendlichen nach Coppenbrügge gezogen wären" (Audible blog, 16 Jan 2025; planet-wissen).
- **Alfred Cammann** (1984, 1957) and **Dobbertin** locate the end in Masuria/Pomerania and concede the limits of proof: "eine Lösung des Rätsels vom Verbleib der 'Kinder' wird uns trotz zahlreicher Versuche über Jahrhunderte hin wohl nicht mehr gelingen" (Cammann 1984, p. 3).
- **Sheila Harty** ("Pied Piper Revisited", in Bridges/McLaughlin eds., *Education and the Market Place*, 1994, p. 89) accepts that "surnames from the region settled are similar to those from Hamelin" but argues the town sold off children it could not support — a reminder that surname similarity, even if granted, does not fix the mechanism.

---

## 4. Documented links between Hamelin/the Weser and the north-east in the 1280s

**Count Nicolaus of Spiegelberg.** The Pomeranian charters do document him — but as a courtier of Duke Bogislaw IV in Stettin, not as a locator. The register of the *Pommersches Urkundenbuch* lists "Nikolaus (1282) II 482. Verwandter des Herzogs Bogislaw IV. (1283) 493. 494. 495. 504. 511. 513. 514. 515. (1284) 529", his brother Hermann "domicellus, beim Herzog Bogislaw IV. (1284) II 523" and Mauritius (529). The 1283 charters are dated Stettin 26 May, 4 June and 19 December (twice), with the formula "Nicolao comite de Spegelberge, consanguineo nostro". The last one, PUB II no. 529, is the document behind Dobbertin's "8 July 1284": "1284 Juli 8. (VIII. idus Julii) Stettyn. Herzog Bogislaw IV. giebt der Marienkirche zu Stettin sechs Hufen im Dorfe Böck … Testes huius rei sunt nobilis vir Nicolaus comes de Speghelberg et fratres ipsius Mauricius et Hermanus … Actum et datum Stettyn anno domini M.CC.LXXXIIII. VII. idus Julii" (the text's *VII idus* would be 9 July; the editor headed it 8 July). Twelve days after 26 June the count and both brothers were thus witnessing a routine grant to St Mary's in Stettin, some 450 km from Hamelin. Nothing in the charter mentions settlers, ships or Hamelin; his presence in Stettin throughout 1283 shows a man resident at his cousin's court rather than one recruiting in the Weser valley. Cammann adds from Dobbertin that "Dieser Graf war ein Abenteurer, in Lüneburg war er 'verfestet', weil er 1277 dort an der Alten Saline einen wachhabenden Stadtsoldaten erschlagen hatte" (1984, p. 1). The Wikipedia genealogy (from Hartmann 1941) lists him as "Nikolaus I. (–1283)", i.e. without a known death date, and states the association with the Piper only as something he "wurde damit in Verbindung gebracht" (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafen_von_Spiegelberg ). Udolph accepts the Spiegelberg place-name transfers to Pasewalk and Allenstein but rejects the Kopahn identification and the "Piepenburg/Rothenfier → Rattenfänger" speculations of Dobbertin and Cammann ("Der Rattenfänger bleibt fern", p. 165). The shipwreck at Kopań (22 July 1284) rests on nothing but the Rügenwalde Gertrude-church legend and the "Koppen" of the Hamelin inscription; the Kopań Wikipedia article's assertion that "Solcher Deutung der Rattenfängersage wird in der Forschung durchaus eine gewisse Wahrscheinlichkeit zugerechnet" (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopa%C5%84_(Dar%C5%82owo) ) is not borne out by Udolph, Mayer or Hucker.

**Other links** (all from Udolph 1997, pp. 156–175, after Dobbertin, Hofmeister, Enders): the Counts of Everstein in Pomerania (Naugard, from the 1270s; Hindenburg near Naugard 1317/1331); the Hindenburg/Hinnenburg family of Brakel near Höxter in the Uckermark (1269) and Pomerania; Duke Barnim I's gift of the church of Pyritz to the Weser convent of Wülfinghausen (1240/1250 — the two dates are both given); Doberan as a daughter of Amelungsborn; the knight *Hinricus de Wesere* buried at Doberan (1304); the *-hagen* villages of the northern Uckermark and Pomerania as a Schaumburg-Lippe/Westphalian settlement type; and, for Moravia, Bishop Bruno of Olmütz (1245–1281), whose entourage was "insbesonders zwischen Minden und Höxter beheimatet" (Wann, quoted p. 128), with the Hemenhusen/Heimsen and Hohenbüchen families and a Hameln-area official Johann Vrolebsen enfeoffed at Katscher in 1273. There is no charter of the Bishop of Minden, of the Ascanian margraves or of any Pomeranian duke recruiting settlers from Hamelin or the Minden diocese in the 1280s; the Ascanian and Pomeranian locator contracts of the period name locators and villages, never source towns.

---

## 5. Scholarship 2000–2026

- **Udolph** himself has not revised the argument: the 2015 Brandenbuch paragraph and the 2023 reprint restate 1997. Harald Bichlmeier's long review of the 2023 volume (*Die Sprache* 56/1, 2024, pp. 216–231) could not be read.
- **Museum Hameln yearbooks** (index 1962–2024): Thomas Küntzel, "Der Kinderauszug von Hameln: eine Kriegslist im Kampf um die Burg Everstein?" (Jahrbuch 2010, pp. 112–127), a new hypothesis linking the exodus to the Welf–Cologne struggle for the Weser and the abandoned town at the Everstein (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burg_Everstein ); Hans-Jörg Uther, "Der Rattenfänger von Hameln – Entstehung und Überlieferung einer berühmten deutschen Sage" (2016, p. 107 ff.; Uther also wrote the *Enzyklopädie des Märchens* article, online 2016, not accessed); Jean Nehrenhausen, "Die Sage vom Rattenfänger von Hameln. Ein neuer Erklärungsversuch" (2016, p. 127 ff.); Hans Fink, "Ein archaischer Ritus im Hintergrund der Sage vom Rattenfänger" (2020); Daberkow/Höflich, "Der Rattenfänger von Hameln" (2021). None of these, from their titles and the museum's public statements, adds onomastic material.
- **Local alternative theories**: Gernot Hüsam (Coppenbrügge; "Der Begriff 'Calvaria' in der Rattenfängersage", Jahrbuch 1993; the Mörsperg watercolour of 1592) — a pagan-festival massacre by the Spiegelbergs at the Koppenberg; rejected by the museum (see 3.6).
- **English-language**: Wolfgang Mieder, *The Pied Piper: A Handbook* (Greenwood 2007) — per the Wikipedia summary it notes documents showing that people from the Hamelin area helped settle Transylvania and presents the emigration theory; Radu Florescu, *In Search of the Pied Piper* (2005) adopts Dobbertin's Baltic shipwreck as most plausible; Harty 1994 (above); Dillan J. Howie, "The Pied Piper of Hamelin: Collective Grief and the Mythologised Memory of Youth Migration in 1284" (academia.edu, June 2025) — a self-uploaded manuscript by an "independent researcher" asserting that "surname evidence indicates a demographic movement", without new data; Medievalists.net (3 Jul 2026) mentions only Transylvania and Mieder. I found no peer-reviewed historical-linguistic reassessment of Udolph's Prignitz/Uckermark thesis in *Fabula*, *Folklore*, the *Zeitschrift für Volkskunde* or the *Niedersächsisches Jahrbuch* after 1997; German Wikipedia's paragraph ("machen die namenskundlichen Belege für die Regionen Prignitz und Uckermark … die Auswanderungstheorie sehr wahrscheinlich") is unreferenced and is the main vector by which the claim now circulates.
- **Brandenburg onomastics**: Sophie Wauer's *Ortsnamenbuch der Uckermark* (2000) has a section "Übertragene Namen"; Enders's *Die Prignitz* (2000) is the standard settlement history. Neither was accessible online; nothing suggests they date any of the transfers to the 1280s.

---

## 6. Assessment

**What the onomastic evidence establishes.** Udolph's 1997 article is a competent and, in its negative parts, devastating audit: it removes the Moravian and most of the Pomeranian name "proofs" of his predecessors, and it leaves a defensible set of about a dozen place-name transfers showing that families from the Weserbergland and Leine valley took part in the colonisation of the Altmark, Prignitz, Uckermark and Hinterpommern in the 13th century. The Beveringen argument (unproductive *-ingen*), the Hamelspringe–Hammelspring pair (a transparent name with no local motivation in the Uckermark) and the medieval *Quernhamel* bynames are good philology.

**What it does not establish.** (1) Any date: the transfers cluster nowhere near 1284 and several pre-date it; Udolph says so. (2) Any specific link to the town of Hamelin: eleven of the twelve names come from elsewhere in the Weserbergland, and most were carried by noble houses. (3) Any surname evidence for the migrants: the article has none, and the 13th-century formation of surnames makes such evidence impossible in principle for the social stratum concerned. (4) The Prignitz/Uckermark as a plausible 1284 destination: by the 1280s their village networks were essentially complete, whereas the frontier of active locator recruitment lay in Hinterpommern, the Neumark, Pomerelia and Prussia. (5) An identity for the Piper: the Spiegelberg charters put Count Nicolaus in Stettin on 8 July 1284 as a ducal kinsman witnessing a pious grant, which is consistent with almost any biography and with none in particular.

**Statistical meaning of "surname matches".** As reported in the press, none can be assigned. The claimed comparison has no published dataset, no comparison population, no null model and no control for polygenesis (Hamel/Hämel/Hameler have at least four unrelated origins), for Hohenhameln, or for the massive 1945 resettlement that Udolph himself identifies as the main shaper of Brandenburg's surname stock. Low German surnames are shared across the whole plain from Westphalia to Pomerania, so "the same names occur in the Prignitz" is close to a tautology. The only unambiguous Hameln surname, *Quernhamel*, is attested in Riga, Danzig and Frankfurt/Oder in 1303–1486 and today survives as three telephone entries south of Berlin.

**Overall.** The onomastic argument, on its own terms, supports the general proposition that Hamelin lay in a region whose people had been leaving for the north-east for two generations before 1284 — which makes an emigration reading of the "Kinderauszug" reasonable but is equally compatible with Hucker's objection that such a well-trodden, well-connected route makes a *traceless* disappearance and a fixed day of mourning hard to explain. It does not raise the Ostsiedlung reading above the level of a plausible hypothesis, and the popular version ("Udolph proved by surnames that the children went to the Prignitz") should be retired.

## 7. Independent evidence that would be needed

1. A charter, locator contract or town record of c. 1284–1290 naming recruits or settlers "de Hamelen/Quernhamelen" in a new foundation (Pomeranian, Neumark, Prussian or Brandenburg Urkundenbücher; Kulm/Lübeck-law town books).
2. A systematic count of "de Hamelen"-type bynames in the earliest burgher books of Hanseatic and colonial towns (Riga, Reval, Danzig, Elbing, Thorn, Königsberg, Stettin, Stralsund, Berlin/Cölln, Frankfurt/Oder, Prenzlau, Perleberg) by decade, against a baseline of other Weser towns (Minden, Rinteln, Höxter, Holzminden), to see whether Hamelin shows a post-1284 spike.
3. A prosopography of Hamelin itself from the *Urkundenbuch des Stiftes und der Stadt Hameln* (to 1407): do families attested up to 1284 vanish afterwards, or does the town's charter output show any demographic break?
4. Precise dating of the eastern foundations that carry Weser names (Hammelspring, Hindenburg near Templin, Beveringen, Dahlhausen, Spiegelberg near Pasewalk) through Wauer's and Enders's material and archaeology/dendrochronology, to test whether any belong to c. 1285–1295.
5. A properly designed surname-geography study using the Deutscher Familiennamenatlas data (2005 telephone lines), restricted to monogenetic Hamelin-specific names, with explicit controls, before any modern-distribution claim is repeated.
6. Attention to the earliest primary sources of the legend themselves — the Marktkirche window (c. 1300), the Lüneburg manuscript note (c. 1430/50), the Hamelin Passionale — which fix the date and the number but say nothing about the east; any onomastic result must be reconciled with what they do say ("to Calvarie bi den Koppen verloren").

---

### Appendix: key URLs
- Udolph 1997 PDF: https://adw-goe.de/fileadmin/forschungsprojekte/ortsnamen_rhein_elbe/dokumente/Publikationen_Udolph_PDF/1996-2000/196._Udolph_Zogen_die_Hamelner_Aussiedler_nach_Maehren_1997.pdf
- Udolph 2015 Brandenbuch PDF: https://adw-goe.de/fileadmin/forschungsprojekte/ortsnamen_rhein_elbe/dokumente/Publikationen_Udolph_PDF/2011-2015/448._Udolph_Orts-_und_Familiennamen._In._Brandenbuch.pdf
- Udolph bibliography 1996–2000: https://adw-goe.de/forschung/forschungsprojekte-akademienprogramm/ortsnamen-zwischen-rhein-und-elbe/personal/udolph/1996-2000
- prof-udolph.com "Über uns": https://www.prof-udolph.com/ueber-uns/
- Tagesspiegel 2006: https://www.tagesspiegel.de/gesellschaft/medien/das-nachnamen-ratsel-1306102.html
- Independent 1998: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/twist-in-the-tale-of-pied-pipers-kidnapping-1141174.html
- BBC 2020: https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20200902-the-grim-truth-behind-the-pied-piper
- Cammann, Preußenland 1984: https://hiko-owp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Preussenland_Jahrgang-22_1984.pdf
- Pommersches Urkundenbuch II/2: https://archive.org/details/kpbc.umk.pl.Pomorze_062_04_23540 ; register III/2: https://archive.org/details/kpbc.umk.pl.Pomorze_062_06_23553
- Museum Hameln yearbook index: https://museumhameln.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2024-08_Uebersicht-Museumsjahrbuch-Aufsaetze-ab-1962-2024.pdf
- Wikipedia (de) Rattenfänger: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rattenf%C3%A4nger_von_Hameln ; Grafen von Spiegelberg: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafen_von_Spiegelberg ; Hammelspring: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammelspring ; Beveringen: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beveringen ; Kopań: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopa%C5%84_(Dar%C5%82owo) ; Burg Everstein (Küntzel 2010): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burg_Everstein
- Wikipedia (en) Pied Piper (TIME/Eastman quotations): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pied_Piper_of_Hamelin
- Settlement chronology: https://www.prignitz-museum.de/siedlungsgeschichte-der-region-an-havel-und-elbe/ ; https://www.landkreis-prignitz.de/de/zu-gast-im-landkreis/Portrait/geschichte_index.php ; https://www.archaeofirm.de/der-hochmittelalterliche-landesausbau-in-der-prignitz-3/ ; https://www.templin.de/templin/ortsteile/hammelspring/
- Phone-book checks: https://www.dastelefonbuch.de/Suche/Querhammel ; https://www.dastelefonbuch.de/Suche/Querhammer
- Howie 2025 (self-published): https://www.academia.edu/130204017/