The criminal case file (volume 1, 392 sheets, plus a second volume of copies and correspondence) was read page by page in Russian and checked against the scans. From it 459 facts were extracted, each with its sheet number; the full tables, with the Russian wording and the places where the circulating English translation diverges from it, are published with this report. The facts below are those any explanation must account for. Sheet numbers are to volume 1.
The people cited are the ones who wrote the documents or testified. Vasily Tempalov was the prosecutor of the district town of Ivdel and wrote the first protocols at the tent and the bodies; Lev Ivanov, from the regional prosecutor's office in Sverdlovsk, took over the investigation in March and closed it. Yevgeny Maslennikov, an experienced hiker who had approved the route, led the search on the ground and kept its notebooks. Boris Slobtsov was the student who found the tent; Vladimir Lebedev, Vadim Brusnitsyn, Sergey Sogrin and Georgy Atmanaki were students and hikers in the search parties; Moisey Akselrod was a mountaineer who had hiked with Dyatlov and led one of them; Aleksey Chernyshov was an army captain who joined the search; Kirill Bardin and Yevgeny Shuleshko were sent from Moscow to assess it. Genrietta Churkina was the forensic criminalist who examined the tent. Dryahlyh, Popov and Pashin were local men questioned about the weather.
The tent
The tent stood on the east-north-east slope of Kholat Syakhl about 150 m below the crest of the spur, on a platform levelled out of the snow with the skis laid under the floor, pitched "very firmly, by all the rules, with the strong wind in mind". The entrance faced south, the ridge was held on ski poles, and the guy lines ran to poles and a spare pair of skis.Sheet 2 (Tempalov's discovery protocol, 28 Feb); 70 (Maslennikov); 89 (Chernyshov); 314 (Lebedev); 366 (Brusnitsyn)
When found on 26 February the entrance end stood on its pole with its guy lines intact; the northern guy lines were torn away, the far ridge had sunk, and that half lay under snow. Slobtsov, who found it, measured the snow on the tent at 15 to 20 cm, "blown on, hard". Maslennikov: "there was not much snow, only what the February blizzards had drifted in".Sheets 298 (Slobtsov); 70 (Maslennikov); 310 (Tempalov); 366 (Brusnitsyn: no pole was ever under the north ridge)
Ski poles and a spare pair of skis still stood upright in the snow around the tent; an ice axe was stuck by the entrance; a Chinese flashlight lay on the canvas of the tent with 5 to 10 cm of snow under it and none on top, and it lit when Slobtsov switched it on.Sheets 298–299 (Slobtsov); 70 (Maslennikov); 214 (Atmanaki)
The forensic criminalist Churkina found three knife cuts in the downhill (right) slope of the canvas, 32, about 89 and about 42 cm long, and from the direction of the thread damage concluded they were made from inside. Everything else was tearing.Sheets 303–304 (Act 199, 16 Apr 1959)
Inside were nine backpacks, eight pairs of boots and three and a half pairs of felt boots, all the warm outer clothing, the stove packed in its case and unlit, food for two or three days, cut slices of loin with a bitten rind, and a flask of alcohol. Nothing of value was missing. The group appeared to be "in the last stage of changing clothes and preparing for the night".Sheets 2; 70; 160 (radiogram 28 Feb); 311 (Tempalov); 314–315 (Lebedev); 337 (Sogrin: the stove was not used); 367 (Brusnitsyn); 385 (Ivanov)
Small items lay a short way downwind of the tent: slippers, socks, ski caps, Dyatlov's fur jacket and a storm jacket; a roll of film about 15 m below; a ski pole found inside cut into several pieces with a clean knife cut; a urine trace near the tent.Sheets 70; 215 (Atmanaki); 299 (Slobtsov); 311 (Tempalov); 315 (Lebedev); 367 (Brusnitsyn)
No witness who saw the tent, the slope or the snow reported any sign of an avalanche, and one said so in terms: Sogrin, at the site on 4 March, "here there was neither an avalanche nor a snow collapse"; Akselrod, "the slope as such played no role in their death". The only "buried by snow" phrase in the file is a radiogram sent on the first evening before the tent was inspected. Ivanov's closing resolution does not contain the word.Sheets 335 and 324 (Sogrin, Akselrod, 24 Apr); 149 (radiogram, 27 Feb 17:45); 384–387
Doroshenko and Krivonischenko lay one metre from a fire under a cedar at the forest edge, 1.5 km from the tent, stripped to shirts and underwear. The fire had burned one and a half to three hours; cedar branches 8 cm thick had burned through. Around the fire lay socks, a checked shirt with 8 roubles in it, a handkerchief and cut-off pieces of clothing.Sheets 3–4 (scene protocol, 27 Feb); 68 (Maslennikov); 216 (Atmanaki); 333 (Sogrin); 366 (Brusnitsyn)
The cedar's dry lower branches were broken off as high as a person can reach and, on the side facing the tent, up to 4 or 5 m, so that "the people seem to have made something like a window" toward the slope they had come from. Twenty or so young firs had been cut with a knife within 20 m, most of them left unused.Sheets 68–69; 91; 216–217; 366
Dyatlov, Slobodin and Kolmogorova lay on a straight line from the fire toward the tent at roughly 300, 480 and 630 m from the fire, heads toward the tent, the two farthest face down "in a pose of crawling toward the tent". Slobodin had 7 to 8 cm of half-ice under his knees and chest, showing he had lived some time in that position; his cap was still on his head.Sheets 4–5; 69–72 (Maslennikov); 216 (Atmanaki); 322 (Akselrod); 386
Kolmogorova's body was under about 10 cm of snow, Slobodin's under 12 to 35 cm; Dyatlov's was visible.Sheets 34–35 (Bardin and Shuleshko); 71; 322
The group cached food for the return journey at the labaz, a store they built in the valley, on the morning of 1 February and set off at 15:00; the last frames on the cameras show the platform being dug, which Ivanov dated from the exposure to "about 17:00"; a joke wall newspaper the group wrote, "Evening Otorten", named after the mountain they were heading for, is dated 1 February; no record or photograph exists after that.Sheets 31; 33 (Bardin and Shuleshko); 73; 385
The file contains no weather-station reading for 1 to 2 February. Ivanov wrote "a low temperature of the order of 25 to 30 degrees" and "strong wind usual in this area"; the search report says the pass usually blows at 15 to 20 m/s and up to 36; three local witnesses describe exceptional winds in the first days of February.Sheets 39; 41, 48, 50 (Dryahlyh, Popov, Pashin); 385
Every first-hand sighting of a light phenomenon in the file is dated 17 February or 31 March 1959. Every statement about a light on 1 February is hearsay or an unanswered query.Sheets 167–168 (radiograms); 211–212, 227, 260, 264–267, 291, 344; 273–274, 270–272, 275–281 (relatives, hearsay)
The closing resolution of 28 May 1959: "considering the absence on all the bodies of external bodily injuries and of signs of a struggle, the presence of all the group's valuables, and the forensic conclusions … the cause of the hikers' death was an elemental force which the hikers were not in a position to overcome."Sheet 387
л.д. 387 · постановление о прекращении уголовного дела, 28 мая 1959
Учитывая отсутствие на всех трупах наружных телесных повреждений и признаков борьбы, наличие всех ценностей группы, а также принимая во внимание заключение судебно-медицинской экспертизы о причинах смерти туристов, следует считать, что причиной гибели туристов явилась стихийная сила, преодолеть которую туристы были не в состоянии.
«Стихийная сила» is an elemental or natural force; the usual English "overwhelming force" loses the sense. The resolution names only wind and cold; it does not mention an avalanche.